fractal cosmology造句
例句與造句
- I m quite certain that it is more unscientific than any form of fractal cosmology.
- First and foremost, it should concisely define what fractal cosmology is in generic terms.
- Is Fractal Cosmology really Fringe science?
- Contrarily, fractal cosmology requires anisotropic matter distribution at the largest scales; interestingly, cosmic microwave background radiation has cosine anisotropy.
- :FYI; I think I got the topic name ( or saw the term ) Fractal cosmology on Max Tegmark's web-site.
- It's difficult to find fractal cosmology in a sentence. 用fractal cosmology造句挺難的
- The future of the Fractal cosmology article should be to bring it more into conformity with Wikipedia s standards of formality, completeness, correctness and informativeness.
- I can find plenty of recent peer-reviewed article publications in serous journals, so the argument that Fractal cosmology died in the 90s doesn't hold water.
- I have resurrected the article Fractal cosmology, and taken note of the many reviewer notes placed by ScienceApologist, which I hope will foster a mutually satisfying resolution of this matter.
- The book " Discovery of Cosmic Fractals " by Yurij Baryshev and Pekka Teerikorpi gives an overview of fractal cosmology, and recounts other milestones in the development of this subject.
- I believe his statement was " Fractal Cosmology is dead ! " but the term had a nice ring to it, and I saw it as a topic that was gathering momentum.
- The fractal cosmology article, as written, was extremely problematic, however, so I redirected it wholesale to nonstandard cosmology . talk ) 13 : 15, 12 November 2008 ( UTC)
- I shall be disappointed if Wikipedia joins the ranks of governments and institutions in presenting the finite-universe liturgy as scientific fact while essentially burning heritical tracts like the article on fractal cosmology.
- By the way, all the references to M . S . El Naschie have been deleted from the fractal cosmology article, why ? ? ! talk ) 23 : 46, 13 November 2008 ( UTC)
- Being the prime author of the Fractal cosmology entry, I would obviously like to see it remain intact, but I welcome commentary, and I'd rather see the article improved or corrected, than have WikiPedia do without it.
- I have steadfastly avoided references to any of my own papers, links to my website ( s ), etc . The reason I chose to create the Fractal cosmology WikiPedia entry was finding out ( through a web search ) that the topic name was redirecting to " Infinite Hierarchal Nested Universes " which covered a lot of material this article does not, but seemed rather unscientific, or'over the Fringe line .'That is; it focused mainly on the views of those somewhat outside the world of established Science, and covered none of what work had been done by serious ( or respected ) researchers closer to the mainstream in their field.